|
|
|
Elizabeth I
of England |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elizabeth I (7 September 1533 – 24 March 1603)
was Queen of England and Queen of Ireland from 17
November 1558 until her death. Sometimes called The
Virgin Queen, Gloriana, The Faerie Queene or Good
Queen Bess, Elizabeth was the fifth and last monarch
of the Tudor dynasty. The daughter of Henry VIII,
she was born a princess, but her mother, Anne
Boleyn, was executed three years after her birth,
and Elizabeth was declared illegitimate. Perhaps for
that reason, her brother, Edward VI, cut her out of
the succession. His will, however, was set aside, as
it contravened the Third Succession Act of 1543, in
which Elizabeth was named as successor if Mary
should die without issue. In 1558 Elizabeth
succeeded her half-sister, Mary I, during whose
reign she had been imprisoned for nearly a year on
suspicion of supporting Protestant rebels.
Elizabeth set out to rule by good counsel,[1] and
she depended heavily on a group of trusted advisers
led by William Cecil, Baron Burghley. One of her
first moves was to support the establishment of an
English Protestant church, of which she became the
Supreme Governor. This Elizabethan Religious
Settlement held firm throughout her reign and later
evolved into today's Church of England. It was
expected that Elizabeth would marry, but despite
several petitions from parliament, she never did.
The reasons for this choice are unknown, and they
have been much debated. As she grew older, Elizabeth
became famous for her virginity, and a cult grew up
around her which was celebrated in the portraits,
pageants and literature of the day.
In government, Elizabeth was more moderate than her
father and siblings.[2] One of her mottos was video
et taceo: "I see but say nothing".[3] This strategy,
viewed with impatience by her counsellors, often
saved her from political and marital misalliances.
Though Elizabeth was cautious in foreign affairs and
only half-heartedly supported a number of
ineffective, poorly resourced military campaigns in
the Netherlands, France and Ireland, the defeat of
the Spanish armada in 1588 associated her name
forever with what is popularly viewed as one of the
greatest victories in British history. Within twenty
years of her death, she was being celebrated as the
ruler of a golden age, an image that retains its
hold on the English people. Elizabeth's reign is
known as the Elizabethan era, famous above all for
the flourishing of English drama, led by playwrights
such as William Shakespeare and Christopher Marlowe,
and for the seafaring prowess of English adventurers
such as Francis Drake and John Hawkins.
Historians, however, are often more cautious in
their judgement. They depict Elizabeth as a
short-tempered,[4] sometimes indecisive ruler,[5]
who enjoyed more than her share of luck. Towards the
end of her reign, a series of economic and military
problems weakened her popularity to the point where
many of her subjects were relieved at her death.
Elizabeth is however acknowledged as a charismatic
performer and a dogged survivor, in an age when
government was ramshackle and limited and when
monarchs in neighbouring countries faced internal
problems that jeopardised their thrones. Such was
the case with Elizabeth's rival, Mary, Queen of
Scots, whom she imprisoned in 1568 and eventually
executed in 1587. After the short reigns of
Elizabeth's brother and sister, her forty-five years
on the throne provided valuable stability for the
kingdom and helped forge a sense of national
identity.[6] |
|
|
|
Early Life |

|
Elizabeth Tudor, c. 1546, by an
unknown artist. The simplicity of
this portrait contrasts with the
ornate icons that came later.[7] |
|
Elizabeth I was born in
Greenwich Palace
on
7
September
1533
and named after her paternal
grandmother,
Elizabeth of York.[8]
She was the second child of
Henry
VIII of England
to survive infancy; her
mother was Henry's second
wife,
Anne
Boleyn.
At birth, Elizabeth was the
heiress presumptive
to the throne of England and
was known as the Princess of
Wales.
Her older half-sister, Mary,
had lost her position as
legitimate heir when Henry
annulled his marriage to
Mary's mother,
Catherine of Aragon,
in order to marry Anne.[9][10]
King Henry had desperately
wanted a legitimate son, to
ensure the Tudor succession.
After Elizabeth's birth,
Queen Anne failed to provide
a male heir. She suffered at
least two miscarriages, one
in 1534 and another at the
beginning of 1536. On
2 May
1536,
she was arrested and
imprisoned. Hastily
convicted on trumped-up
charges, she was
beheaded
on
19 May
1536.[11][12]
|
|
|
|
|
Elizabeth's first governess, Lady Margaret Bryan,
wrote that she was “as toward a child and as gentle
of conditions as ever I knew any in my life”.[17] At
the age of four, Elizabeth passed into the care of
Catherine Champernowne, better known by her later,
married name of Catherine “Kat” Ashley, who remained
Elizabeth’s friend for life. Champernowne clearly
made a good job of Elizabeth’s early education: by
the time William Grindal became her tutor in 1544,
Elizabeth could write English, Latin, and Italian.
Under Grindal, a talented and skilful tutor, she
also progressed in French and Greek.[18] After
Grindal died in 1548, Elizabeth received her
education under Roger Ascham, a sympathetic teacher
who believed that learning should be fun.[19] By the
time her formal education ended in 1550, she was the
best educated woman of her generation.[20]
Thomas Seymour
Henry VIII died in 1547, when
Elizabeth was 13 and a half years old, and was
succeeded by Edward VI. Catherine Parr, Henry's last
wife, soon married Thomas Seymour of Sudeley, Edward
VI's uncle and the brother of the Lord Protector,
Edward Seymour, Duke of Somerset. The couple took
Elizabeth into their household at Chelsea. There
Elizabeth experienced an emotional crisis that
historians believe affected her for the rest of her
life.[21] Seymour, approaching forty but with a
natural charm and "a powerful sex appeal",[21]
engaged in romps and horseplay with the
fifteen-year-old Elizabeth. These included entering
her bedroom in his nightgown, tickling her and
slapping her on the buttocks. This state of affairs
was put to a stop by Catherine Parr, after she
discovered the pair in an embrace.[22][23] In May
1548, Elizabeth was sent away.[24]
That was not the last of the matter, however.
Seymour was ambitious and scheming to control the
royal family.[25][26] When Catherine Parr died of
puerperal fever after childbirth on 5 September
1548, he renewed his attentions towards Elizabeth,
intent on wedding her. [27] For his brother and the
council, this was the last straw.[28] In January
1549, Seymour was arrested on suspicion of plotting
to marry Elizabeth and overthrow his brother. The
details of his former behaviour towards Elizabeth
emerged during an interrogation of Catherine Ashley
and Thomas Parry, Elizabeth’s cofferer.[29]
Elizabeth, living at Hatfield House, would admit
nothing. Her stubbornness exasperated her
interrogator, Sir Robert Tyrwhitt, who reported, "I
do see it in her face that she is guilty".[30]
Seymour was beheaded on 20 March 1549.
Queen
Mary
Edward VI died of tuberculosis on 6
July 1553, aged fifteen. His will swept aside the
1543 Act of Succession, excluded both Mary and
Elizabeth from the succession, and instead declared
as his heir Lady Jane Grey, granddaughter of Henry
VIII's sister Mary, Duchess of Suffolk.[31] Lady
Jane was proclaimed queen, but her support quickly
crumbled away, and she was deposed less than two
weeks later. Mary rode triumphantly into London,
with Elizabeth at her side.[32]
The show of solidarity between the sisters did not
last long. Mary was determined to crush the
Protestant faith in which Elizabeth had been
educated, and she ordered that everyone attend Mass.
This included Elizabeth, who had no choice but to
outwardly conform.[33] Mary's initial popularity
ebbed away when it became known that she planned to
marry Prince Philip of Spain, the son of Emperor
Charles V.[34] Discontent spread rapidly through the
country, and many looked to Elizabeth as a focus for
their opposition to Mary's religious policies. In
January and February 1554, Wyatt's rebellion broke
out in several parts of England and Wales, led by
Thomas Wyatt.[35]
Once the rising had collapsed, Elizabeth was brought
to court and interrogated. On 18 March, she was
imprisoned in the Tower of London, where Lady Jane
Grey had been executed on 12 February to deter the
rebels.[36] The terrified Elizabeth fervently
protested her innocence.[37] Though it is unlikely
that she had plotted with the rebels, some of them
were known to have approached her. Mary's closest
confidant, Charles V's ambassador Simon Renard,
argued that her throne would never be safe while
Elizabeth lived; and the Chancellor, Stephen
Gardiner, worked to have Elizabeth put on trial.[38]
Elizabeth's supporters in the government, however,
among them Lord Paget, convinced Mary to spare her
sister, in the absence of hard evidence against her.
On 22 May, therefore, Elizabeth was moved from the
Tower to Woodstock, where she was to spend almost a
year under house arrest in the charge of Sir Henry
Bedingfield. Crowds cheered her all along the
way.[39][40]
On 17 April 1555, Elizabeth was
recalled to court, to be closely attended during the
final stages of Mary's apparent pregnancy. If Mary
and her child died, Elizabeth would become queen.
If, on the other hand, Mary gave birth to a healthy
child, Elizabeth's chances of becoming queen would
recede sharply.[41] When it became clear that Mary
was not pregnant, no one believed any longer that
she could ever have a child.[42] Elizabeth's
succession seemed assured.[43] Even Philip, who
became King of Spain in 1556, acknowledged the new
political reality. From this time forward, he
cultivated Elizabeth, preferring her to the likely
alternative, Mary, Queen of Scots, who was betrothed
to the Dauphin of France.[44] When his wife fell ill
in 1558, Philip sent the Count of Feria to consult
with Elizabeth.[45] By October, Elizabeth was making
plans for her government. On 6 November, Mary
recognised Elizabeth as her heir.[46][47] A week
later, Mary died.
Queen
Elizabeth
Elizabeth became queen at the age of
twenty-five. As her triumphal progress wound through
the city on the eve of the ceremony, she was
welcomed wholeheartedly by the citizens and greeted
by orations and pageants, most with a strong
Protestant flavour. Elizabeth's open and gracious
responses endeared her to the spectators, who were
"wonderfully ravished".[48] The following day,
Elizabeth was crowned at Westminster Abbey and
anointed by the bishop of Carlisle. Then she was
presented for the people's acceptance, amidst a
deafening noise of organs, fifes, trumpets, drums
and bells.[49]
On 20 November 1558, Elizabeth declared her
intentions to her Council and other peers who had
come to Hatfield to swear allegiance. The speech
contains the first record of her often-used metaphor
of the "two bodies": the body natural and the body
politic:
My lords, the law of nature moves me to sorrow for
my sister; the burden that is fallen upon me makes
me amazed, and yet, considering I am God's creature,
ordained to obey His appointment, I will thereto
yield, desiring from the bottom of my heart that I
may have assistance of His grace to be the minister
of His heavenly will in this office now committed to
me. And as I am but one body naturally considered,
though by His permission a body politic to govern,
so shall I desire you all...to be assistant to me,
that I with my ruling and you with your service may
make a good account to Almighty God and leave some
comfort to our posterity on earth. I mean to direct
all my actions by good advice and counsel.[52]
Elizabeth's coronation took place on 15 January
1559.
Religion
Elizabeth was in no doubt that most
of her subjects wished her to repudiate the pope and
Spanish influence. This chimed with her own
conscience and the policies of Sir William Cecil,
her Secretary of State, and her chief advisors. She
also knew that the papacy would never recognise her
as the legitimate child of Henry VIII and the
rightful ruler of England.[53] She therefore
determined to establish a Protestant church suited
to the needs of the English people.[54] As a result,
the parliament of 1559 legislated for a church based
on the settlement of Edward VI, with the monarch as
its head.[55] The House of Commons backed the
proposals strongly, but the bill of supremacy met
opposition in the House of Lords, particularly from
the bishops. Elizabeth was fortunate, however, that
many bishoprics were vacant at the time, including
the Archbishop of Canterbury[56][57] This enabled
the Protestant peers to outvote the bishops and
conservative peers.
After various negotiations and changes to the
wording, the new Act of Supremacy became law on 8
May 1559. Elizabeth's title was to be Supreme
Governor of the Church of England, rather than the
more contentious Supreme Head. All public officials
would have to swear an oath of loyalty to the
monarch or risk being barred from office. On the
other hand, the heresy laws were repealed, to
prevent a repeat of the persecution of dissenters
practised by Mary. A new Act of Uniformity was
passed at the same time. This made attendance at
church and the use of an adapted version of the 1552
Book of Common Prayer compulsory, though the
penalties for disobedience were not extreme.[58]
Many Catholics, particularly on the continent,
regarded Elizabeth as a heretic. In 1570, Pope Pius
V excommunicated her, calling her the "pretended
queen of England". This sanction, which in theory
released English Catholics from allegiance to
Elizabeth, served only to identify the English
church more closely with the crown. It also placed
English Catholics in greater danger. By encouraging
them to rebel, it raised doubts about their loyalty
to the queen.[59]
Marriage Question
From the start of Elizabeth's reign,
the question arose of whom she would marry. In fact,
she never married, and the reasons for this are not
clear. Historians have speculated that Thomas
Seymour had put her off sexual relationships, or
that she knew herself to be infertile.[60][61] Until
bearing a child became impossible, however, she
considered several suitors, the last being François,
Duke of Anjou, in 1581. Elizabeth had no need of a
man's help to govern; and marrying risked a loss of
control or of foreign interference in her affairs,
as had happened to her sister Mary. On the other
hand, marriage offered the chance of an heir.[62]
Elizabeth often received offers of marriage, but she
only seriously considered three or four suitors for
any length of time. Of these, her childhood friend
Robert Dudley probably came closest. During 1559,
Elizabeth's friendship with the married Dudley seems
to have turned to love. Rumours, very probably
false, spread that she was sleeping with him;[63]
and William Cecil, Elizabeth's most trusted advisor,
made clear his disapproval. When Dudley's wife, Amy
Robsart, was found dead in 1560, almost certainly of
natural causes but in suspicious circumstances, a
great scandal arose.[64] For a time, Elizabeth
seriously considered marrying Dudley; but after
several months, she put duty ahead of her feelings
and decided against the marriage. Dudley, whom she
made Earl of Leicester and appointed to the Privy
Council, retained a special place in her heart,
though her infatuation mellowed in time to a special
and lasting friendship. Leicester and Elizabeth had,
at very least, a Platonic relationship; it might
have been more than that, as implied in histories
and classical poetry. After Elizabeth died, a note
from Dudley, who had died in 1588, was found among
her possessions, marked "his last letter".[65]
After the Dudley affair, Elizabeth
kept the marriage question open but often only as a
diplomatic ploy.[66] She appears to have considered
marriage out of duty rather than personal
preference. Parliament repeatedly petitioned her to
marry, but she always answered evasively.[67] In
1563, she told an imperial envoy: "If I follow the
inclination of my nature, it is this: beggar-woman
and single, far rather than queen and married".[66]
In the same year, following Elizabeth's illness with
smallpox, the succession question became a heated
issue. Parliament urged the queen to marry or
nominate an heir, to prevent a civil war upon her
death. She refused to do either. In April, she
prorogued the Parliament, which did not reconvene
until she needed its support to raise taxes in 1566.
The House of Commons threatened to withhold funds
until she agreed to provide for the succession. In
1566, Sir Robert Bell boldly pursued the issue
despite Elizabeth's command to desist and became the
target of her anger "in her own words: 'Mr. Bell
with his complices must needs prefer their speeches
to the upper house to have you my lords, consent
with them, whereby you were seduced, and of
simplicity did assent unto it'."[68]
In 1566, she confided to the Spanish ambassador that
if she could find a way to settle the succession
without marrying, she would do so. By 1570, senior
figures in the government privately accepted that
Elizabeth would never marry or name a successor.
William Cecil was already seeking solutions to the
succession problem.[66] For this stance, as for her
failure to marry, she was often accused of
irresponsibility.[69] However, Elizabeth's silence
strengthened her own political security: she knew
that if she named an heir, her throne would be
vulnerable to a coup.[70]
Elizabeth's unmarried status inspired a cult of
virginity. In poetry and portraiture, she was
depicted as a virgin or a goddess or both, not as a
normal woman.[71] At first, only Elizabeth made a
virtue of her virginity: in 1559, she told the
Commons, "And, in the end, this shall be for me
sufficient, that a marble stone shall declare that a
queen, having reigned such a time, lived and died a
virgin".[71] Later on, particularly after 1578,
poets and writers took up the theme and turned it
into an iconography that exalted Elizabeth. In an
age of metaphors and conceits, she was portrayed as
married to her kingdom and subjects, under divine
protection. In 1599, Elizabeth spoke of "all my
husbands, my good people".[72]
Foreign Policy
Apart from the Dudley affair,
Elizabeth treated the marriage issue as an aspect of
foreign policy.[74] Though she turned down Philip
II's own offer in 1559, she negotiated for several
years to marry his cousin Archduke Charles of
Austria. However, relations with the Habsburgs
deteriorated by 1568. Elizabeth then considered
marriage to two French Valois princes in turn, first
Henri, Duke of Anjou, and later, from 1572 to 1581,
his brother François, Duke of Anjou.[75] This last
proposal was tied to a planned alliance against
Spanish control of the Southern Netherlands.[76]
Elizabeth seems to have taken the courtship
seriously for a time. She even wore a frog-shaped
earring that Anjou had sent her.[77]
Elizabeth's foreign policy was largely defensive.
The exception was the disastrous occupation of Le
Havre from October 1562 to June 1563, when
Elizabeth's Huguenot allies joined with the
Catholics to retake the port. Elizabeth's had
intended to exchange Le Havre for Calais, retaken by
France in January 1558.[78] She sent troops into
Scotland in 1560 to prevent the French using it as a
base.[79] In 1585, she signed the Treaty of Nonsuch
with the Dutch to block the Spanish threat to
England.[80] Only through the activities of her
fleets did Elizabeth pursue an aggressive policy.
This paid off in the war against Spain, 80% of which
was fought at sea.[81] She knighted Francis Drake
after his circumnavigation of the globe from 1577 to
1580, and he won fame for his raids on Spanish ports
and fleets. Her reign also saw the first
colonisation or "planting" of new land in America;
and the colony of Virginia was named for her. In
truth, however, an element of piracy and
self-enrichment drove Elizabethan seafarers, over
which the queen had little control.[82][83] |
|
|
|
Mary Queen of
Scots |

|
Mary, Queen of Scots. School of
François Clouet |
|
Elizabeth's first policy toward Scotland was
to oppose the French presence there.[84] She
feared that the French planned to invade
England and put Mary, Queen of Scots, who
was in effect the heir to the English
crown,[85] on the throne.[86] Elizabeth was
persuaded to send a force into Scotland to
aid the Protestant rebels, and though the
campaign was inept, the resulting Treaty of
Edinburgh of July 1560 removed the French
threat in the north.[87] When Mary returned
to Scotland in 1561 to take up the reins of
power, the country had an established
Protestant church and was run by a council
of Protestant nobles supported by
Elizabeth.[88] Mary refused to ratify the
treaty.[89]
|
|
Elizabeth offended Mary by proposing her own former
suitor, Robert Dudley, as a husband.[90] Instead, in
1565 Mary married Henry Stuart, Lord Darnley, who
carried his own claim to the English throne. The
marriage, however, was the first of a series of
errors of judgement by Mary that handed the victory
to the Scottish Protestants and to Elizabeth.
Darnley quickly became unpopular in Scotland and
then infamous for presiding over the murder of
Mary's Italian secretary David Rizzio. In February
1567, Darnley was murdered by conspirators almost
certainly led by James Hepburn, Earl of Bothwell.
Shortly afterwards, on 15 May 1567, Mary married
Bothwell, arousing suspicions that she had been
party to the murder of her husband. Elizabeth wrote
to her:
How could a worse choice be made for your honour
than in such haste to marry such a subject, who
besides other and notorious lacks, public fame has
charged with the murder of your late husband,
besides the touching of yourself also in some part,
though we trust in that behalf falsely.[91]
These events led rapidly to Mary's defeat and
imprisonment in Loch Leven Castle. The Scottish
lords forced her to abdicate in favour of her son
James, who had been born in June 1566. James was
taken to Stirling Castle to be raised as a
Protestant. Mary escaped from Loch Leven in 1568 but
after another defeat fled across the border into
England, where she had once been assured of support
from Elizabeth. Elizabeth's first instinct was to
restore her fellow monarch; but she and her council
instead chose to play safe. Rather than risk
returning Mary to Scotland with an English army or
sending her to France and the Catholic enemies of
England, they detained her in England. She was
imprisoned there for the next nineteen years.[92]
Mary was soon the focus for rebellion. In 1569,
plotters in the Rising of the North talked of
freeing her, and a scheme arose to marry her to
Thomas Howard, Duke of Norfolk. Elizabeth reacted by
sending Howard to the block. Mary may not have been
told of every Catholic plot to put her on the
English throne, but from the Ridolfi Plot of 1571 to
the Babington Plot of 1586, Elizabeth's spymaster
Sir Francis Walsingham and the royal council keenly
assembled a case against her.[93] At first,
Elizabeth resisted calls for Mary's death. By late
1586, however, she had been persuaded to sanction
her trial and execution on the evidence of letters
written during the Babington Plot.[94] Elizabeth's
proclamation of the sentence announced that "...the
said Mary, pretending title to the same Crown, had
compassed and imagined within the same realm divers
things tending to the hurt, death and destruction of
our royal person...".[95] On 8 February 1587, Mary
was beheaded at Fotheringay Castle,
Northamptonshire.[96]
Spain
After the disastrous occupation and loss of Le Havre
in 1562–1563, Elizabeth avoided military expeditions
on the continent until 1585. In that year, she sent
an English army to aid the Protestant Dutch rebels
against Philip II. This followed the deaths in 1584
of the allies William the Silent, Prince of Orange,
and François, Duke of Anjou, and the surrender of a
series of Dutch towns to Alexander Farnese, Duke of
Parma, Philip's governor of the Spanish Netherlands.
In December 1584, an alliance between Philip II and
the French Catholic League at Joinville undermined
the ability of Anjou's brother, Henry III of France,
to counter Spanish domination of the Netherlands. It
also extended Spanish influence along the channel
coast of France, where the Catholic League was
strong and exposed England to invasion.[97] The
English and the Dutch reacted in August 1585 with
the Treaty of Nonsuch, whereby Elizabeth, pressured
by her advisors, promised military support to the
Dutch. The treaty marked the beginning of the
Anglo-Spanish War, which lasted until the Treaty of
London in 1604.
Elizabeth distrusted this course of action from the
start. The expedition, led by her old flame, Robert
Dudley, Earl of Leicester, achieved nothing.[98]
Elizabeth's strategy, to use the English army as a
defensive bargaining tool, was soon at odds with
that of Dudley, who wanted to fight an active
campaign but lacked the resources to do so. He
enraged Elizabeth by accepting the post of
Governor-General from the Dutch States-General.
Elizabeth saw this as a Dutch ploy to embroil her
further in their defence.[99] She wrote to him:
We could never have imagined (had we not seen it
fall out in experience) that a man raised up by
ourselves and extraordinarily favoured by us, above
any other subject of this land, would have in so
contemptible a sort broken our commandment in a
cause that so greatly touches us in honour....And
therefore our express pleasure and commandment is
that, all delays and excuses laid apart, you do
presently upon the duty of your allegiance obey and
fulfil whatsoever the bearer hereof shall direct you
to do in our name. Whereof fail you not, as you will
answer the contrary at your utmost peril.[100]
Elizabeth and her parliament's failure to send
Dudley sufficient money and troops, combined with
his own incompetence as a military leader, doomed
the campaign to impotence. Dudley finally resigned
his command in December 1587, his reputation in
tatters. By that time, Philip II had decided to take
the war to England.[101]
On 12 July 1588, the Spanish Armada,
a great fleet of ships, set sail for the channel,
planning to ferry a Spanish invasion force under the
Duke of Parma to the coast of southeast England from
the Netherlands. The armada, however, was defeated
by a combination of miscalculation,[102] misfortune,
and an attack of English fire ships on 1 August off
Gravelines which dispersed the Spanish ships to the
northeast. The armada straggled home to Spain in
shattered remnants, after disastrous losses on the
coast of Ireland.[103] Unaware of the armada's fate,
English forces mustered to defend the country.
Elizabeth inspected her troops at Tilbury in Essex
on 8 August. Wearing a silver breastplate over a
white velvet dress, she addressed them in one of her
most famous speeches:[104]
My loving people, we have been persuaded by some
that are careful of our safety, to take heed how we
commit ourselves to armed multitudes for fear of
treachery; but I assure you, I do not desire to live
to distrust my faithful and loving people....I know
I have the body but of a weak and feeble woman, but
I have the heart and stomach of a king, and of a
King of England too, and think foul scorn that Parma
or Spain, or any Prince of Europe should dare to
invade the borders of my realm.[105]
When no invasion came, the nation rejoiced.
Elizabeth's procession to a thanksgiving service at
St Paul's Cathedral rivalled that of her coronation
as a spectacle.[106] The defeat of the armada was a
potent propaganda victory, both for Elizabeth and
for Protestant England. The English took their
delivery as a symbol of God's favour and of the
nation's inviolability under a virgin queen.[107]
However, the victory was not a turning point in the
war, which continued and often favoured Spain.[108]
The Spanish still controlled the Netherlands, and
the threat of invasion remained.[109] Sir Walter
Raleigh claimed after her death that Elizabeth's
caution had impeded the war against Spain:
If the late queen would have believed her men of war
as she did her scribes, we had in her time beaten
that great empire in pieces and made their kings of
figs and oranges as in old times. But her Majesty
did all by halves, and by petty invasions taught the
Spaniard how to defend himself, and to see his own
weakness.[110]
Though some historians have criticised Elizabeth on
similar grounds,[111] Raleigh's verdict has more
often been judged unfair. Elizabeth had good reason
not to place too much trust in her commanders, who
once in action tended, as she put it herself, "to be
transported with an haviour of vainglory".[112]
France
When the Protestant
Henry IV inherited the French throne in 1589,
Elizabeth sent him military support. It was her
first venture into France since the retreat from Le
Havre in 1563. Henry's succession was strongly
contested by the Catholic League and by Philip II,
and Elizabeth feared a Spanish takeover of the
channel ports. The subsequent English campaigns in
France, however, were disorganised and
ineffective.[113] Lord Willoughby, largely ignoring
Elizabeth's orders, roamed northern France to little
effect, with an army of 4,000 men. He withdrew in
disarray in December 1589, having lost half his
troops. In 1591, the campaign of John Norreys, who
led 3,000 men to Brittany, was even more of a
disaster.[114] As for all such expeditions,
Elizabeth was unwilling to invest in the supplies
and reinforcements requested by the commanders.
Norreys left for London to plead in person for more
support. In his absence, a Catholic League army
almost destroyed the remains of his army at Craon,
north-west France, in May 1591. In July, Elizabeth
sent out another force under Robert Devereux, Earl
of Essex, to help Henry IV in besieging Rouen. The
result was just as dismal. Essex accomplished
nothing and returned home in January 1592.[115] As
usual, Elizabeth lacked control over her commanders
once they were abroad. "Where he is, or what he
doth, or what he is to do," she wrote of Essex, "we
are ignorant".[116]
Ireland
Although Ireland was one of her two
kingdoms, Elizabeth faced a hostile—and in places
virtually autonomous[117]—Catholic population that
was willing to plot with her enemies. Her policy
there was to grant land to her courtiers and prevent
the rebels from giving Spain a base from which to
attack England.[118] In response to a series of
uprisings, the English forces pursued scorched-earth
tactics, burning the land and slaughtering man,
woman and child. During a revolt in Munster led by
Gerald FitzGerald, Earl of Desmond, in 1582, an
estimated 30,000 Irish people starved to death. The
poet Edmund Spenser wrote that the victims "were
brought to such wretchedness as that any stony heart
would have rued the same".[119] Elizabeth advised
her commanders that the Irish, "that rude and
barbarous nation", be well treated; but she showed
no remorse when force and bloodshed were deemed
necessary.[120]
Between 1594 and 1603, Elizabeth faced her most
severe test in Ireland, with the revolt known as
Tyrone's Rebellion, or the Nine Years War. Its
leader, Hugh O'Neill, Earl of Tyrone, was backed by
Spain.[121] In spring 1599, Elizabeth sent Robert
Devereux, 2nd Earl of Essex, to put the revolt down.
To her frustration,[122] he made little progress and
returned to England without permission. He was
replaced by Charles Blount, Lord Mountjoy, who took
three years to defeat the rebels. O'Neill finally
surrendered in 1603, a few days after Elizabeth's
death.[123]
Last
Years and Death
As Elizabeth aged and marriage became
unlikely, her image gradually changed. She was
portrayed as Belphoebe or Astraea, and after the
Armada, as Gloriana, the eternally youthful Faerie
Queene of Edmund Spenser's poem. Her painted
portraits became less realistic and more a set of
enigmatic icons that made her look much younger than
she was. In fact, her skin had been scarred by
smallpox in 1562, leaving her half bald and
dependent on wigs and cosmetics.[124][125] Sir
Walter Raleigh called her "a lady whom time had
surprised".[126] However, the more Elizabeth's
beauty faded, the more her courtiers praised
it.[127]
Elizabeth was happy to play the part,[128] but it is
possible that in the last decade of her life she
began to believe her own performance.[129] She
became fond and indulgent of the charming but
petulant young Robert Devereux, Earl of Essex, who
took liberties with her for which she forgave
him.[129] She repeatedly appointed him to military
posts, despite his growing record of
irresponsibility. After Essex's desertion of his
command in Ireland in 1599, however, Elizabeth had
him placed under house arrest and the following year
deprived him of his monopolies.[130] In February
1601, the earl tried to raise a rebellion in London.
He intended to seize the queen, but few rallied to
his support, and he was beheaded on 25 February.
Elizabeth knew that her own misjudgements were
partly to blame for this turn of events. An observer
reported in 1602 that "Her delight is to sit in the
dark, and sometimes with shedding tears to bewail
Essex".[131]
The monopolies Elizabeth reclaimed from Essex were
her typical reward for a courtier during last years
of her reign. She had come to rely on this cost-free
system of patronage rather than ask Parliament for
more subsidies at a time of war.[132] The practice
soon led to price-fixing, the enrichment of
courtiers at the public's expense, and widespread
resentment.[133] This culminated in agitation in the
House of Commons during the parliament of 1601.[134]
In her famous "Golden Speech" of 30 November 1601,
Elizabeth professed ignorance of the abuses and won
the members over with promises and her usual appeal
to the emotions.[135]:
Who keeps their sovereign from the lapse of error,
in which, by ignorance and not by intent they might
have fallen, what thank they deserve, we know,
though you may guess. And as nothing is more dear to
us than the loving conservation of our subjects'
hearts, what an undeserved doubt might we have
incurred if the abusers of our liberality, the
thrallers of our people, the wringers of the poor,
had not been told us![136]
The period after the defeat of the Armada in 1588
brought new difficulties for Elizabeth that lasted
until the end of her reign.[137] The conflicts with
Spain and in Ireland dragged on, the tax burden grew
heavier, and the economy was hit by poor harvests
and the cost of war. Prices rose, and the standard
of living fell.[138][139] During this time,
repression of Catholics intensified, and in 1591,
Elizabeth authorised commissions to interrogate and
monitor Catholic householders.[140] To maintain the
illusion of peace and prosperity, she increasingly
relied on propaganda.[141] In her last years,
mounting criticism reflected a decline in the
public's affection for her.[142]
This same period of economic and political
uncertainty, however, produced an unsurpassed
literary flowering in England.[143] The first signs
of a new literary movement had appeared at the end
of the second decade of Elizabeth's reign, with John
Lyly's Euphues and Edmund Spenser's The Shepheardes
Calender in 1578. During the 1590s, some of the
great names of English literature entered their
maturity, including William Shakespeare and
Christopher Marlowe. Together with the Jacobean era
that followed, the English theatre reach its highest
peaks.[144] The notion of a great Elizabethan age
depends largely on the builders, dramatists, poets,
and musicians who were active during Elizabeth's
reign. They owed little directly to the queen, who
was never a major patron of the arts.[145]
Elizabeth's most trusted advisor,
Burghley, died on 4 August 1598. His political
mantle passed to his son, Robert Cecil, who soon
became the leader of the government.[146] One task
he addressed was to prepare the way for a smooth
succession. Since Elizabeth would never name her
successor, Cecil was obliged to proceed in
secret.[147] He therefore entered into a coded
negotiation with James VI of Scotland, the rightful
but unrecognised heir. Cecil coached the impatient
James to humour Elizabeth and "secure the heart of
the highest, to whose sex and quality nothing is so
improper as either needless expostulations or over
much curiosity in her own actions".[148] The advice
worked. James's tone delighted Elizabeth, who
responded: "So trust I that you will not doubt but
that your last letters are so acceptably taken as my
thanks cannot be lacking for the same, but yield
them to you in grateful sort".[149] In historian J.
E. Neale's view, Elizabeth may not have declared her
wishes openly to James, but she made them known with
"unmistakable if veiled phrases".[150]
The Queen's health remained fair until the autumn of
1602, when a series of deaths among her friends
plunged her into a depression. In February 1603, the
death of her cousin and close friend, Catherine
Carey, Countess of Nottingham, came as a particular
blow. In March, Elizabeth fell sick and lay in a
"settled and unremovable melancholy".[151] She died
on 24 March 1603 at Richmond Palace, between two and
three in the morning. A few hours later, Cecil and
the council set their plans in motion and proclaimed
James Stuart of Scotland as James I of England.[152]
Elizabeth's coffin was carried
downriver at night to Whitehall, on a barge lit with
torches. At her funeral on 28 April, the coffin was
taken to Westminster Abbey on a hearse drawn by four
horses hung with black velvet. In the words of the
chronicler John Stow:
Westminster was surcharged with multitudes of all
sorts of people in their streets, houses, windows,
leads and gutters, that came out to see the obsequy,
and when they beheld her statue lying upon the
coffin, there was such a general sighing, groaning
and weeping as the like hath not been seen or known
in the memory of man.[153]
Legacy
Elizabeth was lamented, but the
people were relieved at her death.[154] A new age
was born, and at first the signs were good, with the
ending of the war against Spain in 1604 and lower
taxes. Until the death of Robert Cecil in 1612, the
government ran along much the same lines as
before.[155] James I's rule, however, became
unpopular when he turned state affairs over to court
favourites; and in the 1620s there was a nostalgic
revival of the cult of Elizabeth.[156] Elizabeth was
praised as a heroine of the Protestant cause and the
ruler of a golden age. James was depicted as a
Catholic sympathiser, presiding over a corrupt
court.[157] The triumphalist image that Elizabeth
had cultivated towards the end of her reign, against
a background of factionalism and military and
economic difficulties,[158] was taken at face value
and her reputation inflated. Godfrey Goodman, Bishop
of Gloucester, recalled: "When we had experience of
a Scottish government, the Queen did seem to revive.
Then was her memory much magnified."[159]
Elizabeth's reign became idealised as a time when
crown, church and parliament had worked in
constitutional balance.[160]
The picture of Elizabeth painted by her Protestant
admirers of the early seventeenth century has proved
lasting and influential.[162] Her memory was also
revived during the Napoleonic Wars, when the nation
again found itself on the brink of invasion.[163] In
the Victorian era, the Elizabethan legend was
adapted to the imperial ideology of the
day.[164][165] In the mid-twentieth century,
Elizabeth was a romantic symbol of the national
resistance to foreign threat.[166][167] Historians
of that period, such as J. E. Neale (1934) and A. L.
Rowse (1950), interpreted Elizabeth's reign as a
golden age of progress.[168]
Recent historians, however, have taken a more
complicated view of Elizabeth.[169] Her reign is
famous for the defeat of the armada, and for
successful raids against the Spanish, such as those
on Cádiz in 1587 and 1596. But historians point to
military failures on land and even at sea, for
example in the "Islands voyage" of 1597.[170]
Elizabeth's problems in Ireland also stain her
record.[171] Rather than as a brave defender of the
Protestant nations against Spain and the Habsburgs,
she is more often regarded as cautious in her
foreign policies. She offered minimum aid to foreign
Protestants and failed to provide her commanders
with the funds to make a difference abroad.[172]
Elizabeth established an English church that helped
shape a national identity and remains in place
today.[173][174][175] Those who praised her later as
a Protestant heroine overlooked her refusal to drop
all Catholic practices.[176][177] Historians note
that in her day, strict Protestants regarded the
Acts of Settlement and Uniformity of 1559 as a
compromise.[178][179][180] In fact, Elizabeth
believed that faith was personal and did not wish,
as Francis Bacon put it, to "make windows into men's
hearts and secret thoughts".[181][182]
Despite Elizabeth's largely defensive
foreign policy, her reign raised England's status
abroad. "She is only a woman, only mistress of half
an island," marvelled Pope Sixtus V, "and yet she
makes herself feared by Spain, by France, by the
Empire, by all".[183] Under Elizabeth, the nation
gained a new self-confidence and sense of
sovereignty, as Christendom
fragmented.[184][185][186] Elizabeth was the first
Tudor to recognise that a monarch ruled by popular
consent.[187] She therefore always worked with
parliament and advisers she could trust to tell her
the truth—a style of government that her Stuart
successors failed to follow. Some historians have
called her lucky;[183] she believed that God was
protecting her.[188]Priding herself on being "mere
English",[189] Elizabeth trusted in God, honest
advice, and the love of her subjects for the success
of her rule.[190] In a prayer, she offered thanks to
God that:
[At a time] when wars and seditions with grievous
persecutions have vexed almost all kings and
countries round about me, my reign hath been
peacable, and my realm a receptacle to thy afflicted
Church. The love of my people hath appeared firm,
and the devices of my enemies frustrate.[183] |
|
|
|
References |
-
^
"I mean to direct all my actions by good advice
and counsel." Elizabeth's first speech as queen,
Hatfield House, 20 November 1558. Loades, 35.
-
^
Starkey, 5.
-
^
Neale, 386.
-
^
In 1593, the French ambassador confessed: "When
I see her enraged against any person whatever, I
wish myself in Calcutta, fearing her anger like
death itself". Somerset, 731–32.
-
^
Somerset, 729.
-
^
Starkey, 5.
-
^
"The painter...is unknown, but in a competently
Flemish style he depicts the daughter of Anne
Boleyn as quiet and studious-looking, ornament
in her attire as secondary to the plainness of
line that emphasizes her youth. Great is the
contrast with the awesome fantasy of the later
portraits: the pallid, mask-like features, the
extravagance of headdress and ruff, the padded
ornateness that seemed to exclude all humanity."
Gaunt, 37.
-
^
Somerset, 4.
-
^
Loades, 3–5
-
^
Somerset, 4–5.
-
^
Loades, 6–7.
-
^
Haigh, 1–3.
-
^
In the act of July 1536, it was stated that
Elizabeth was "illegitimate... and utterly
foreclosed, excluded and banned to claim,
challenge, or demand any inheritance as lawful
heir...to [the King] by lineal descent".
Somerset, 10.
-
^
"It had taken Henry VIII a month to dispose of
his wife on a charge of treason, sweep some of
her friends to the block with her, bastardise
her child, and acquire a new queen. Here was the
power of the Tudor monarchy in action, with the
King bending his Council, the Church, and the
law to do his will." Haigh, 1.
-
^
Loades, 7–8.
-
^
Davenport, 32.
-
^
Somerset, 11.
-
^
Our knowledge of Elizabeth’s schooling and
precocity comes largely from the memoirs of
Roger Ascham, also the tutor of Prince Edward.
Loades, 8–10.
-
^
Somerset, 25.
-
^
Loades, 21.
-
^ a
b Loades, 11.
-
^
Loades, 14.
-
^
"Kat Ashley told another of Elizabeth’s
servants, Thomas Parry, that the Queen lost
patience with both her husband and Elizabeth
after she ‘suddenly came upon them where they
were all alone, he having her in his arms’.”
Somerset, 23.
-
^
She moved into the household of Catherine
Ashley’s sister Joan and her husband, Sir
Anthony Denny, at Cheshunt. Loades, 16.
^ Haigh, 8.
-
^
Not only Elizabeth but Princess Mary and Lady
Jane Grey had lived in Seymour's household at
various times. Seymour had also "wormed his way"
into King Edward’s confidence by slipping him
pocket money and calling the Lord Protector
stingy; and he had tried to have himself
appointed the governor of the King’s person.
Neale, 32.
-
^
Williams, 24.
-
^
Neale, 33.
-
^
Loades, 14, 16.
-
^
Neale, 33.
-
^
Loades, 24–25.
-
^
Elizabeth had assembled 2,000 horsemen, "a
remarkable tribute to the size of her affinity".
Loades 25.
-
^
Loades, 26.
-
^
Loades, 27.
-
^
Neale, 45.
-
^
Somerset, 49.
-
^
Loades, 28.
-
^
Somerset, 51.
-
^
Loades, 29.
-
^
"The wives of Wycombe passed cake and wafers to
her until her litter became so burdened that she
had to beg them to stop." Neale, 49.
-
^
Loades, 29.
-
^
Loades, 32.
-
^
Somerset, 66.
-
^
Neale, 53.
-
^
Loades, 33.
-
^
Neale, 59.
-
^
Somerset, 71.
-
^
Somerset, 89–90. The "Festival Book" account,
from the British Library
-
^
Neale, 70.
-
^
Loades, 34.
-
^
Another copy of the lost original has been
attributed both to Nicholas Hilliard and to
Levina Teerlinc. See Strong, 163, and Doran, 43.
-
^
Full document reproduced by Loades, 36–37.
-
^
Somerset, 92.
-
^
Loades, 46.
-
^
Loades, 46.
-
^
"It was fortunate that ten out of twenty-six
bishoprics were vacant, for of late there had
been a high rate of mortality among the
episcopate, and a fever had conveniently carried
off Mary's Archbishop of Canterbury, Reginald
Pole, less than twenty-four hours after her own
death". Somerset, 98.
-
^
"There were no less than ten sees unrepresented
through death or illness and the carelessness of
'the accursed cardinal' [Pole]". Black, 10.
-
^
Somerset, 101–103.
-
^
Hogge, 46–47.
-
^
Loades, 38.
-
^
Haigh, 19.
-
^
Loades, 39.
-
^
Loades, 42.
-
^
In April 1559, Amy had been reported as
suffering from a "malady in one of her breasts",
and it is now assumed that she had cancer. At
the time, it was widely believed that Dudley had
done away with her in order to marry the queen.
Somerset, 166–167.
-
^
Loades, 42–45.
-
^ a
b c Haigh, 17.
-
^
Loades, 40.
-
^
Hasler, 421–424.
-
^
Haigh, 20–21.
-
^
When in 1566 a parliamentary commission urged
Elizabeth to name an heir, she referred to the
way "a second person, as I have been" had been
used as the focus of plots against her sister,
Queen Mary. Haigh, 22–23.
-
^ a
b Haigh, 23.
-
^
Haigh, 24.
-
^
Frieda, 397.
-
^
Loades, 51.
-
^
Loades, 53–54.
-
^
Loades, 54.
-
^
Somerset, 408.
-
^
Frieda, 191.
-
^
Loades, 55.
-
^
Haigh, 135.
-
^
Loades, 61.
-
^
Flynn and Spence, 126–128.
-
^
Somerset, 607–611.
-
^
Haigh, 131.
-
^
Mary's position as heir derived from her great
grandfather Henry VII, through Henry VIII's
sister Margaret Tudor. In her own words, "I am
the nearest kinswoman she hath, being both of us
of one house and stock, the Queen my good sister
coming of the brother, and I of the sister".
Guy, 115.
-
^
On Elizabeth's accession, Mary's Guise relatives
had pronounced her Queen of England and had the
English arms emblazoned with those of Scotland
and France on her plate and furniture. Guy,
96–97.
-
^
By the terms of the treaty, both British and
French troops withdrew from Scotland. Haigh,
132.
-
^
Loades, 67.
-
^
Loades, 68.
-
^
Loades, 68.
-
^
Letter to Mary, Queen of Scots, 23 June 1567.
Quoted by Loades, 69–70.
-
^
Loades, 72–73.
-
^
Loades, 73.
-
^
Guy, 483–484.
-
^
Loades, 78–79.
-
^
Guy, 1–11.
-
^
Haigh, 135.
-
^
Haigh, 134.
-
^
Haigh, 137.
-
^
Letter to Robert Dudley, Earl of Leicester, 10
February 1586, delivered by Sir Thomas Heneage.
Loades, 94.
-
^
Haigh, 138.
-
^
When the Spanish naval commander, the Duke of
Medina Sidonia, reached the coast near Calais,
he found the Duke of Parma's troops unready and
was forced to wait, giving the English the
opportunity to launch their attack. Loades, 64.
-
^
Neale, 300.
-
^
Though most historians accept that Elizabeth
gave such a speech, its authenticity has been
questioned (Frye, The Myth of Elizabeth at
Tilbury, 1992), since it was not published until
1654. Doran, 235–236.
-
^
Somerset, 591.
-
•
Neale, 297–98.
-
^
Neale, 300.
-
^
Loades, 61.
-
^
Black, 353.
-
^
Haigh, 138.
-
^
Haigh, 145.
-
^
For example, C. H. Wilson (Berkeley, 1970)
castigates Elizabeth for half-heartedness in the
war against Spain. Haigh, 183.
-
^
"In some respects she had a firmer grasp of
strategy than the men to whom she had to entrust
the conduct of the war, and certainly much more
damage was caused by her commanders' failure to
adhere to carefully formulated instructions than
by Elizabeth's vacillation or attempts to
economise." Somerset, 655.
-
^
Haigh, 142.
-
^
Haigh, 143.
-
^
Henry abandoned the siege in April. Haigh, 143.
-
^
Haigh, 143–144.
-
^
One observer wrote that Ulster, for example, was
"as unknown to the English here as the most
inland part of Virginia". Somerset, 667.
-
^
Loades, 55.
-
^
Somerset, 668.
-
^
Somerset, 668–669.
-
^
Loades, 98.
-
^
In a letter of 19 July 1599 to Essex, Elizabeth
wrote: "For what can be more true (if things be
rightly examined) than that your two month's
journey has brought in never a capital rebel
against whom it had been worthy to have
adventured one thousand men". Loades, 98.
-
^
Loades, 98–99.
-
^
Loades, 92.
-
^
Gaunt, 37.
-
^
Haigh, 171.
-
^
Loades, 92.
-
^
"The metaphor of drama is an appropriate one for
Elizabeth's reign, for her power was an
illusion—and an illusion was her power. Like
Henry IV of France, she projected an image of
herself which brought stability and prestige to
her country. By constant attention to the
details of her total performance, she kept the
rest of the cast on their toes and kept her own
part as queen." Haigh, 179.
-
^ a
b Loades, 93.
-
^
Loades, 97.
-
^
Black, 410.
-
^ A
Patent of Monopoly gave the holder control over
an aspect of trade or manufacture. See Neale,
382.
-
^
Williams, 208.
-
^
Black, 192–194.
-
^
She gave the speech at Whitehall Palace to a
deputation of 140 members, who afterwards all
kissed her hand. Neale, 383–384.
-
^
Loades, 86.
-
^
Black, 353.
-
^
Haigh, 155.
-
^
Black, 355–356.
-
^
Black, 355.
-
^
Haigh, 155.
-
^
This criticism of Elizabeth was noted by
Elizabeth's early biographers William Camden and
John Clapham. For a detailed account of such
criticisms and of Elizabeth's "government by
illusion", see chapter 8, "The Queen and the
People", Haigh, 149–169.
-
^
Black, 239.
-
^
Black, 239–245.
-
^
Haigh, 176.
-
^
After Essex's downfall, James VI of Scotland
referred to Cecil as "king there in effect".
Croft, 48.
-
^
Cecil wrote to James, "The subject itself is so
perilous to touch amongst us as it setteth a
mark upon his head forever that hatcheth such a
bird". Willson, 154.
-
^
Willson, 154.
-
^
Willson, 155.
-
^
Neale, 385.
-
^
Black, 411.
-
^
Black, 410–411.
-
^
Weir, 486.
-
^
Loades, 100.
-
^
Willson, 333.
-
^
Somerset, 726.
-
^
Strong, 164.
-
^
Haigh, 170.
-
^
Weir, 488.
-
^
Dobson and Watson, 257.
-
^
Strong, 163–164.
-
^
Haigh, 175, 182.
-
^
Dobson and Watson, 258.
-
^
Loades, 100.
-
^
The age of Elizabeth was redrawn as one of
chivalry, epitomised by courtly encounters
between the queen and sea-dog "heroes" such as
Drake and Raleigh. Some Victorian narratives,
such as Raleigh laying his cloak before the
queen or presenting her with a potato, remain
part of the myth. Dobson and Watson, 258.
-
^
Haigh, 175.
-
^
In his preface to the 1952 reprint of Queen
Elizabeth I, J. E. Neale observed: "The book was
written before such words as "ideological",
"fifth column", and "cold war" became current;
and it is perhaps as well that they are not
there. But the ideas are present, as is the idea
of romantic leadership of a nation in peril,
because they were present in Elizabethan times".
-
^
Haigh, 182.
-
^
Haigh, 183.
-
^
Haigh, 142.
-
^
Black, 408–409.
-
^
Haigh, 142–147, 174–177.
-
^
Loades, 46–50.
-
^
Weir, 487.
-
^
Hogge, 9–10.
-
^
The new state religion was condemned at the time
in such terms as "a cloaked papistry, or mingle
mangle". Somerset, 102.
-
^
"The problem with the 'Protestant heroine' image
was that Elizabeth did not always live up to it.
London Protestants were horrified in 1561 when
they heard of the plan to get Spanish support
for a Dudley marriage by offering concessions on
religion, and it took Elizabeth almost a decade
to re-establish her Protestant credentials."
Haigh, 165.
-
^
Haigh, 45–46, 177.
-
^
Black, 14–15.
-
^
Collinson, 28–29.
-
^
Williams, 50.
^ Haigh, 42.
-
^ a
b c Somerset, 727.
-
^
Somerset, 726.
-
^
Hogge, 9n.
-
^
Loades, 1.
-
^
As Elizabeth's Lord Keeper, Sir Nicholas Bacon,
put it on her behalf to parliament in 1559, the
queen "is not, nor ever meaneth to be, so wedded
to her own will and fantasy that for the
satisfaction thereof she will do anything...to
bring any bondage or servitude to her people, or
give any just occasion to them of any inward
grudge whereby any tumults or stirs might arise
as hath done of late days". Starkey, 7.
-
^
Somerset, 75–76.
-
^
Edwards, 205.
-
^
Starkey, 6–7.
-
^
Black, Genealogical Table 1: Queen Elizabeth and
her relations (back of book).
|
|
"Elizabeth I of England" Wikipedia, The Free
Encyclopaedia. 22 July 2004, 10:55 UTC. Wikimedia
Foundation, Inc. 10 Aug. 2004.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_I
All
text is available under the terms of the Wikipedia - Text
of the GNU Free Documentation License |
|
|
|